-
For whom the Belsner tolls…do not let it toll for you
In the unlikely event you have not considered the lengthy (23 pages) judgment of the Court of Appeal or indeed perused one of the very many detailed and informative summaries of the case Belsner v Cam Legal Services Limited or perhaps you are a visitor…
-
Be careful when preparing your CFA agreement – mistakes can be costly!
The wonderful resource that is BAILII continues to provide judgments in cases that matter. https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2022/2054.pdf Follow the link for another tale of woe and warning for solicitors when drawing up agreements. (1) DIAG HUMAN SE (2) MR JOSEF STAVA v VOLTERRA FIETTA (A FIRM) Neutral…
-
Harmans Costs Brief – October 2019
This month’s Costs Brief features an in-depth look at some recent judgments which caught the eye of Gary Knight. Plus there are details of the latest CPR update which clarifies the cut off between budgeted and incurred costs. We hope you find the latest Costs…
-
Case law update – September 2019
The last couple of months have presented numerous judgments, far too many to cover here though the following caught the eye of Gary Knight: Vivek Rattan v Carter Ruck – SCCO 20/05/19 (amended 19/07/19). Before Master Leonard an assessment of costs between solicitor and client.…
-
Harmans Costs Brief – March 2019
This month’s Costs Brief has been taken over by Gary Knight who looks at some recent costs related decisions and highlights, among other things, the importance of seeking an interim payment in respect of costs at the conclusion of the case as well as the…
-
Legal costs update by Gary Knight
As prepared by Partner and Costs Lawyer Gary Knight for the next edition of Litigation Funding magazine. October 2018 saw a flurry of costs related decisions and I could not bid farewell to 2018 without comment: Stephen John Culliford (1) Dawn Lane (2) -v- Jocelyn…
-
Budana v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust: Costs Appeal
Before LADY JUSTICE GLOSTER Vice President of the Court of Appeal, Civil Division LORD JUSTICE MCFARLANE and LORD JUSTICE HICKINBOTTOM – 5 December 2017 Much anticipated guidance provided for the profession to the question of when a conditional fee agreement (CFA) can be assigned from…
-
Proportionality – still no further forward
Earlier this month, the Court of Appeal handed down the long awaited case of BNM v MGN Limited [2017] EWCA Civ 1767. The judgment was significant in that it overturned Master Gordon-Saker’s decision that the new test of proportionality applied to additional liability claims in…
-
Harman Costs Brief – May 2017
In this issue Costs Lawyer Suzanna Popplewell gives an overview of Proportionality; we look at CFAs and ATE Premiums and also feature a budget preparation fee explanation. Not forgetting it’s the month of the London Legal Walk! We hope you find the latest issue of…
Tags: ATE, budget fee, budget preparation, budgeted costs, budgeting, CCMC, CFA, Civil Court Proceedings Fees, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, costs, costs budget, costs management, Court of Appeal, Court of Protection, CPR, Deeds of Variation, Detailed Assessment, disproportionate, fixed costs, fixed fees, General Management, hearing fees, LASPO, LLST, London Legal Walk, Lord Justice Jackson, Merrix, PD3E, Practice Direction, pre/post April 2013, Precedent H, Professional Deputy Costs, proportionality, SCCO, success fees, Supreme Court -
CFAs and ATE Premiums
Post LASPO Deeds of Variation and Assignments The Supreme Court has ruled that post LASPO variations to a pre-LASPO CFA did not constitute “new agreements” – see Plevin –v- Paragon Finance Ltd [2017] UKSC 23. There were two subsequent Deeds of Variation which respectively covered…
